| Financial
Year to |
31
March 2007 |
31
March 2006 |
| Taxable
Profits |
£ |
% |
£ |
% |
| First |
10,000 |
19 |
10,000 |
0 |
| Next |
40,000 |
19 |
40,000 |
23.75 |
| Next |
250,000 |
19 |
250,000 |
19 |
| Next |
1,200,000 |
32.75 |
1,200,000 |
32.75 |
| Over |
1,500,000 |
30 |
1,500,000 |
30 |
| Non-corporate
Distribution Rate |
|
n/a |
|
19 |
| |
| £10,000 - £50,000 |
n/a |
19/400 |
| £300,000 - £1,500,000 |
11/400 |
11/400 |
|
The rate of first year allowance for capital expenditure by small
businesses on plant and machinery is increased from 40% to 50%
for the period of one year from 1 April 2006 for companies and
from 6 April 2006 for businesses subject to income tax.
Two changes are proposed to the existing rules relating to R&D
tax relief and vaccines research relief:
- the period for claiming an enhanced deduction for R&D expenditure
is to be aligned to the time limit for R&D tax credits and
becomes the first anniversary of the filing date for the company’s
corporation tax return. Transitional rules will apply to enhanced
deduction claims for accounting periods ended before 31 March
2006. These claims will need to be made by the earlier of the
current time limit for claims (six years after the end of accounting
period in which the claim is made) and 31 March 2008;
- the definition of R&D qualifying expenditure is to be extended
to include payments made to clinical trial volunteers. This will
apply to expenditure by large companies from 1 April 2006 and
for SMEs from when state aid approval has been received by the
Government from the European Commission (EC).
The Government also intends to provide additional support to firms
with between 250 and 500 employees through the R&D tax credits
system. Details of the proposals will be published later in the
year following state aid discussions with the EC.
The Chancellor has announced significant changes to the Enterprise
Investment Scheme (EIS), the Corporate Venturing Scheme (CVS) and
the Venture Capital Trust Scheme (VCT). For EIS investors, the
annual investment limit for income tax purposes is doubled to £400,000.
Investors in VCTs will now only benefit from income tax relief
at 30% (currently 40%). Another change is the reduction in the
maximum size of companies able to raise money under the EIS, VCT
and CVS schemes; this is reduced to £7 million before the
investment and £8 million afterwards (‘the gross assets
test’). This is a major reduction from the previous limits
of £15 million before and £16 million afterwards.
However, the Chancellor has increased the minimum holding period
for VCT investments from three to five years. All of the above
changes take effect from 6 April 2006 except that the new gross
assets test will not apply in relation to sums raised by VCTs prior
to 6 April 2006 nor to EIS or CVS shares subscribed for before
22 March 2006.
The meaning of ‘investment’ under the VCT legislation
has been changed in that with effect from 6 April 2007, a VCT must
have 70% by value of its investments represented by qualifying
holdings and no more than 15% of that total investment in any single
company. This will mean that any money held by a VCT after 6 April
2007 will be treated as an investment.
The Chancellor has chosen this year to reform film tax relief
rather than extend the previous relief which will continue to apply
to those films which commenced principal photography on or before
31 March 2006, provided the film is completed before 1 January
2007. The existing relief will also continue to apply to films
acquired before 1 October 2007.
The new relief will apply from 1 April 2006 to UK film producing
companies (FPCs) incurring expenditure on the production of British
films. Each film will be treated as a separate trade for tax purposes.
The new rules will provide a deduction on a maximum of 80% of total
UK qualifying expenditure (which must in turn be at least 25% of
total production expenditure). An additional deduction of 100%
will be due for films with total qualifying production expenditure
(QPE) of £20 million or less, 80% otherwise. Where this results
in a loss, this can be surrendered for a tax credit, payable at
25% for films with up to £20 million of QPE and 20% for all
other qualifying films.
Following the European Court of Justice decision in the case of
Marks and Spencer plc v Halsey in December 2005, the Government
is to legislate to bring the group relief legislation into line
with EC law. The new relief will apply from 1 April 2006 where
a UK parent company has a foreign subsidiary (including an indirectly
held subsidiary) which has incurred a foreign tax loss that is
unrelievable in the home state (or elsewhere) and where that subsidiary
is either resident in the EEA or has incurred the losses in a permanent
establishment in the EEA.
The foreign losses will be relievable against UK profits only
where all possibilities of relief have been exhausted and future
relief is unavailable in the country where incurred or in any other
country.
The foreign tax loss will need to be recomputed under UK tax principles.
The UK claimant company will need to be able to demonstrate that
the losses meet all the relevant conditions of the legislation.
Anti-avoidance rules have already been pre-announced to apply
from 20 February 2006 to prevent loss relief where arrangements
are made either to prevent foreign losses being made unrelievable
outside the UK, where they otherwise would have been relievable
or where foreign losses are generated that would not have existed
but for the availability of relief in the UK and where the main
purpose or one of the main purposes of those arrangements was to
obtain UK tax relief.
As announced in the 2005 Pre-Budget Report, anti-avoidance legislation
effective from 5 December 2005 is being introduced to prevent schemes
or arrangements aimed at gaining a tax advantage from capital losses.
This legislation is aimed at preventing:
- the contrived creation of corporate capital losses
- the buying of capital gains and losses; and
- the conversion of income streams into capital gains and the
creation of a capital gain matched by an income deduction, where
the gains are then wholly or partly covered by capital losses.
The existing legislation only exempted charities from tax if the
trade was carried on as a primary purpose of the charity or it
was carried on by the charity’s beneficiaries. In many cases
however, the trade of a charity became mixed with a non-exempt
trade so that the tax exemption would become ‘tainted’ and
leave the charity potentially exposed to tax on the trade as a
whole. This problem has now been overcome by introducing a new
measure which allows a trade to be split and the profits apportioned
between the exempt and taxable activities. Up until now HM Revenue & Customs
has usually agreed to split the activities into separate trades
but this approach was not strictly supported by case law and always
left charities potentially exposed. The new measure which takes
effect for chargeable periods commencing on or after 22 March 2006
will remove the previous uncertainty.
This Budget has also tried to address the misuse of charitable
funds and reliefs both by individuals and companies. The anti-avoidance
provisions announced on Budget Day will tackle these abuses in
three ways. The first will be to restrict the dealings that a charity
can have with its substantial donors who are defined as those giving £25,000
or more in a single twelve month period or £100,000 or more
over a six year period. ‘Dealings’ has a fairly wide
meaning and involves the majority of commercial transactions, payment,
exchanges, remuneration and investments. A breach of the rules
may involve withdrawal of tax relief from the charity.
The second anti-avoidance measure is to introduce a direct link
between non-charitable expenditure incurred by a charity and a
loss of tax relief on a pound for pound basis. Lastly the present
legislation restricts the benefits which individuals and close
companies can receive as a result of making a gift to a charity.
A new anti-avoidance provision will apply the same restrictions
to gifts made by non- close companies. These anti-avoidance measures
take affect on or after 22 March 2006 except for the third measure
which will affect donations to charities made on or after 1 April
2006.
Legislation is to be introduced, applicable from 1 April 2006,
to align the tax treatment of plant and machinery which is leased
or acquired with other forms of finance. The legislation will apply
to leases to be known as ‘long funding leases’. It
will not apply to leases of less than five years’ duration
and to leases of between five and seven years, where certain conditions
are met.
The new tax treatment applying to long funding leases will be:
- the lessor will be taxed on the proportion of the rental income
that reflects the financing charges and will not be able to claim
capital allowances;
- the lessee will be able to claim capital allowances and receive
a deduction for that part of the rentals relating to the finance
element.
The proposed legislation will include provisions for certain transitional
arrangements, companies within tonnage tax and for elections by
lessors to apply the legislation to leases not exceeding £10
million in value.
The Treasury has been watching the activity of leasing companies
for some time and has been aware that these companies are commonly
set up within a wider group context so that capital allowances
can be used to mitigate other group companies tax liabilities.
A new measure has therefore been introduced to crystallise this
deferred tax by recovering the full benefit of the capital allowances
claimed when the leasing company is sold. The sale will trigger
the end of an accounting period and the tax will crystallise. In
compensation, the company will be given an equal amount of tax
relief in the next accounting period. This applies where changes
in economic ownership of lessor companies occur on or after 5 December
2005.
Where a subsidiary company of a UK company became non-resident
in the UK for tax purposes before 1 April 2002 as a result of the
operation of a double tax treaty, with effect from 22 March 2006
that company will be brought within the controlled foreign company
legislation under certain circumstances.
|